Bumper year for Britains 10m banker

Patrick Hosking: Financial Editor & , : {}

Stuart Gulliver was yesterday declared as the highest-paid identifiable landowner in London, with a �10 million package for 2009.

HSBCs head of investment promissory note was one of five comparison management team of the bank who together were paid �38.5 million in income and bonuses, the annual inform disclosed.

Mr Gulliver, who has worked for HSBC for thirty years, certified to feeling worried about being singled out and affianced to give a little of the income to charity.

His rewards were given of a fender year for the investment promissory note division, that trebled enlarge to $10.5 billion among clever markets and abundant deals.

Related LinksGoldman Sachs daring on compensate packetsHSBC trainer gives �4m reward to gift

Mr Gulliver perceived a �9 million reward and �800,000 in bottom pay, as well as pick payments, that sloping him over the �10 million mark. Three colleagues, additionally in the investment bank, were paid sum packages of �9.3 million, �9 million and �4.3 million.

Mike Geoghegan, HSBCs arch executive, perceived �5.6 million in pay, reward and pick equipment and reliable plans to compensate up to �4 million to charities around the world. An HSBC orator pronounced that this meant that the complete worth of his bonus, set at �4 million, would be handed over to gift if and when it was paid out over the subsequent 3 years.

Mr Geoghegan, in a statement, pronounced that he and his mother Jania had anonymously upheld tutorial charities in multiform countries over the years and the deduction would go to charities together with ones in Hong Kong and the UK.

Stephen Green, HSBCs chairman, who was paid �1.25 million, concurred distinct and pardonable open annoy over a little landowner rewards, but strongly shielded HSBCs payments as positively right for all the stakeholders. Mr Green applauded Mr Geoghegans gift decision, saying: I salute him for it. Its a conspicuous gesture. It shows the description of the man.

Mr Geoghegans matter on his munificent plans combined to vigour on pick tip HSBC executives. Mr Gulliver said: Of march I give to charity. Of march I will go on to give to charity.

Mr Geoghegan upheld the payments to Mr Gulliver, saying: If I had to reinstate Stuart, Id have to compensate significantly some-more than hes paid today.

Mr Gulliver additionally justifed the bonus, observant that his multiplication had contributed $20 billion in enlarge to the organisation during the 3 years of the misfortune monetary predicament given the 1930s. None of it was down to poor rescue financial offering to banks around the world, he said.

Douglas Flint, financial director, perceived a �2.1 million reward on tip of his bottom compensate of �700,000, that has been lifted to �800,000 in the stream year.

The bonuses will be paid in paid in instalments shares, that can be cashed in over 3 years and are theme to clawback.

Mr Green, who was not long ago forced by shareholder vigour to desert plans to lift Mr Geoghehans bottom compensate by 40 per cent, done solid that he would be going in to conflict again. By most measures Mr Geoghegan was underpaid compared with his peers in pick big companies and banks, he said.

Although a series of comparison bankers next house turn in London banks are thought to have perceived eight-figure packages, nothing has been named. Many main house bankers have waived bonuses.

Overall, HSBC reported a 56 per cent enlarge in underlying enlarge to $13.3 billion after stripping out organization to help the poor spoil and the roller-coaster float of the worth of the own debt, that distorts the picture. Its shares were noted 5 per cent reduce to 679p among beating about indolent income expansion and bad debt in the Middle East.

The American consumer financial operation, that was at the heart of HSBCs new problems, lost an additional $5.3 billion in the year, nonetheless HSBC pronounced that it was mending some-more fast than had been expected.

How to give it all away

Analysis: Mark Bridge

Giving millions to gift has clunky taxation implications, quite for those in the open eye. The simplest choice is to ask your employer to give the income true to the selected cause. This equates to that it is never warranted for taxation purposes and the gift receives all of it.

But this income scapegoat is frowned on by HM Revenue and Customs and a little companies do not assent it. The pick is to have gifts from a net reward payment, reclaiming income taxation but not inhabitant word or Alistair Darlings reward tax, utilizing Gift Aid or by giving by a free trust.

The Gift Aid intrigue is a minefield. For example, if you wish to give a gift �4 million, you should write a coupon for �3.2 million. If you write one for �4 million, you give the gift �5 million, but contingency have warranted and paid taxation on the latter amount. If you havent, you will be probable for some-more tax. Nevertheless it competence capture critique if a high-profile chairman who has pronounced he is giving X to gift wrote a coupon for less. A higher-rate taxpayer can retrieve 20p per �1 donated in further to 20p for the charity, but the normal is to present this remission as well.

Large gifts that account initiatives temperament the donors name competence be branded self-centredness projects. And gifts around family trusts that await humanities projects or bursaries at open schools competence encounter the Charity Commissions standards but not wider approval. Mike Geoghegans preference to give to childrens charities should be a protected bet.

He and Peter Sands, of Standard Chartered, will have entrance to experts at organisations such as the Charities Aid Foundation and New Philanthropy Capital, as well as dilettante solicitors such as Withers, all of that suggest donors on how to maximize the worth of gifts.